Composure As A Mental Skill

“Composure is the ruler of instability”
~ Lao Tzu

What Exactly Is Composure?

Composure is up there when we consider some of the most important mental skills to develop as an athlete or performer. But how many consider composure a mental skill that can be practised and improved?

First, let’s work out what we mean when we say composure.

The dictionary definition is the feeling of being calm, confident, and in control. Searching for its meaning in sports suggests “whether emotions dictated how someone performed under pressure.

I want to explore an example from the perspective of a spectator. 

As I alluded to above, the context of the situation usually plays a role. In this example, let’s say we are watching an important match, the scorelines are close, and there comes a crucial moment in the competition where an athlete can influence the outcome. When we watch them, there is a sense of poise, their body language is confident, and their movements are precise and full of conviction. 

The play is booming, and the audience applauds. We intuitively know there was pressure at that moment, but the athlete did not seem to waver in their appearance and execution. The assumption we usually make after seeing this is that the athlete must have felt calm to do this. However, in my experience as a performance psychologist, athletes are commonly stressed during these moments.

The answers lie not in how we control the experience of feeling calm but more in staying committed to our performance actions while the stress is present.

The Separation Of Actions From Emotions

Fundamentally, when we talk about building composure, is the expectation that we must change our emotional state or actions? The first step towards composure is understanding our openness to our emotional experience.

If we expect to change our emotional state before taking action, this creates a significantly limited approach to our performance. Essentially, we create a condition on our performance where if it works, then we can do well, and if it does not, then we can’t. Secondly, it shifts our concentration away from the present competition in front of us. We concentrate on an uncomfortable, natural human experience we have little control over.

I want to clarify that I’m not saying we have to give up on a calm state but more about having some psychological flexibility towards it to take the most meaningful actions with or without it.

This allows us to free ourselves from the conditions of our actions, creating the opportunity for the preferred psychological experiences. Have you ever had a moment in your sport or anywhere else where you noticed pressure or emotions building up? Instead of giving into the emotional reaction, you committed to a different, more meaningful action. 

Even if the outcome didn’t go your way, did you genuinely regret doing it? There is something liberating about letting go of the emotional control agenda and acting in a way aligned with who you want to be. 

If you want to read more about emotions in sports, my colleague, Madalyn Incognito, has written more about them in this article.

A World-Class Example of Sporting Composure

Roger Federer is the first athlete to come to mind when considering composure as a mental skill.

If you could create an example of someone who might have “managed emotions well” after 20 grand slam titles and the way he carried himself on the court, I would have picked RF to be that guy.

However, when you listen to his interviews, time after time, he openly discusses moments where he felt pressure, felt nervous, and noticed that he had thoughts about losing. Yet he manages his body language well, trusts his preparation and prioritises his behaviour on the court first.

Hear it from the man, the legend himself:

When asked about how to stay calm under pressure, his response contains three key elements:

  • Be passionate and love the sport (all aspects of it)
  • Accepting challenging circumstances and the outcome for whatever it is
  • On the court, give everything you have

Having A Process Focus

As I described at the beginning, composure has a situational component. We value it more in high-pressure moments. Part of the psychology of composure is how we interpret pressure. I define pressure as an expectation to create a result. How we perceive our ability to control the results influences what we focus on, which can then influence our performance. 

Try answering the question: how much control do you have over the result? For the most part, in sports, so many factors outside our control influence the result. We can execute our abilities flawlessly and still not achieve the desired outcome. 

Condor Performance’s founding sport psychologist, Gareth J. Mole, goes into more detail in this article, and I highly recommend giving it some of your time.

Where we place our focus during performance matters a lot. Overfocusing on trying to create a result that we can only partially influence will create an unstable foundation for composure.

That means that when a high-pressure situation occurs, composure is maintained by a deep understanding of what they have influence over in that moment: their actions. We observe their ability to be present in their process. 

A Summary Of Composure

To summarise, composure is about how we respond to our actions when we know it is essential. Often, a mix of human experiences, thoughts and feelings accompany these moments, which can be uncomfortable. Try to practice psychological flexibility in these moments, be open to those experiences and commit to your process. Our emotions do not have to dictate our actions. Meaningful actions unhooked from emotions are what create fulfilling human experiences.

Composure is an excellent topic I could discuss further, but it is a nice way to get the ball rolling. Please share some of your thoughts or personal experiences in the comments below.

If you are ready to start working one-on-one to develop composure and mental skills, fill out one of our four Mental Toughness Questionnaires, and one of our team will get back to you with your results and information about our services.

Feedback for Teams

Although this fascinating article by Dr Michelle Pain uses eSports throughout to provide examples of the concepts covered, it is worthwhile reading for anybody involved in the coaching or participation of groups.

Feedback for Teams using esports for the examples

Feedback for Teams: Cultivating a Culture of Open Communication in Esports

In the high-stakes, fast-paced world of esports, success hinges not only on individual skill but on the ability of a team to function as a cohesive unit. One of the most critical tools for achieving this synergy is feedback for teams—a structured, intentional process that allows players and coaches to identify what’s working, what isn’t, and how to iterate toward improvement. However, fostering an environment where feedback flows freely requires more than just scheduling post-scrim debriefs; it demands a deliberate focus on psychological safety, collaborative leadership, and shared accountability. This article explores how esports organisations can build a culture where feedback for teams becomes a catalyst for growth rather than a source of friction.

1. Psychological Safety: The Foundation of Honest Feedback for Teams

Before a team can engage in open dialogue, players must feel safe enough to speak candidly without fear of judgment or retaliation. Psychological safety—the belief that one can take interpersonal risks without negative consequences—is the bedrock of effective feedback for teams. In esports, where egos and emotions often run high, establishing this trust is non-negotiable.

A daily debrief tool, used consistently after scrims or matches, can institutionalize this practice. For example, structuring discussions around questions like “What did we do well today?” and “Where did we fall short?” shifts the focus from blaming individuals to analysing collective performance. Coaches and team leaders must actively model vulnerability by acknowledging their own mistakes first (“I should have called rotations earlier”), demonstrating that feedback for teams is a collaborative process, not a witch hunt. Over time, this consistency builds a culture where players feel empowered to voice concerns about strategy, communication, or even role discomfort.

2. Collaborative Feedback for Teams vs. Accusatory Language

The difference between productive feedback for teams and toxic criticism often lies in framing. Accusatory language (“You threw that fight”) triggers defensiveness, while collaborative phrasing (“How can we better position next time?”) invites problem-solving. In esports, where split-second decisions define outcomes, teams must prioritise clarity over blame.

A debrief tool can enforce this by requiring feedback to adhere to a “we” mindset. For instance, using a “Start-Stop-Continue” framework:

This structure ensures feedback for teams remains forward-looking and solution-oriented. Additionally, setting ground rules—like “critique the play, not the player”—helps depersonalise mistakes. When a support player admits to struggling with shot-calling, the team’s response should focus on redistributing responsibilities, not assigning fault.

3. Leadership Modelling: Graceful Feedback for Teams

Effective feedback for teams starts at the top. Coaches and team captains must exemplify how to give and receive constructive criticism. This means balancing honesty with empathy—for example, pairing critiques with recognition (“Your mid-game rotations were sharp, but let’s tighten our early-game vision control”). Leaders who respond gracefully to feedback themselves (“Thanks for pointing that out—I’ll adjust the practice schedule”) reinforce that growth, not perfection, is the goal.

In esports, where many leaders are former players, transitioning from a “star performer” mindset to a “servant leader” mentality is crucial. A coach who openly seeks input from analysts or lower-ranked players (“What did you see from the observer view?”) signals that feedback for teams is a collective effort, not a top-down mandate. This humility trickles down, encouraging players to view feedback as a tool, not a threat.

4. Creating Space for Vulnerability in Feedback for Teams

Some esports roles—whether DPS, support, or IGL (in-game leader)—carry immense pressure. Players may hesitate to admit they’re struggling in their assigned position, fearing they’ll be benched or criticised. Feedback for teams must normalise vulnerability by framing role adjustments as strategic pivots, not failures.

During debriefs, coaches can ask direct but supportive questions:

  • “Does anyone feel their current role isn’t leveraging their strengths?”
  • “What support do you need to succeed in this position?”

When a player voices discomfort, the team can collaboratively explore solutions, such as revising compositions or adjusting practice drills. Celebrating players who speak up (“Thanks for being honest—let’s tackle this together”) reinforces psychological safety. Over time, this openness prevents minor issues from snowballing into resentment or burnout.

5. Recognition: Fuelling Motivation Through Feedback for Teams

Feedback for teams isn’t just about fixing flaws—it’s also about amplifying what works. Publicly recognizing improvements sparked by feedback (“Our late-game coordination has improved 30% since we adjusted comms”) motivates players to stay engaged. Similarly, praising selfless acts (“Shoutout to Alex for switching heroes to cover our weak side”) ties individual sacrifices to team success.

‘Giving recognition’ is a key strategy for a team’s success. Players work harder when they know their teammates will comment when they do something right, and I encourage that recognition in the game (except don’t just say ‘Nice!’; use their name too, e.g., ‘Nice, Sam!’) and in the debriefing tool. 

6. Shared Accountability: The Ultimate Goal of Feedback for Teams

The pinnacle of effective team feedback is shared accountability—the understanding that every member owns the problems and the solutions. This mindset shifts the narrative from “Who messed up?” to “How do we fix this together?”

For example, if a team consistently loses control of key objectives, the debrief should explore systemic fixes (e.g., revising practice drills, assigning dedicated scouts) rather than scapegoating. Leaders can reinforce this by using inclusive language (“We need to improve our map awareness”) and distributing ownership of action items (“Jaden, can you lead the vision control drill tomorrow?”).

7. How I Make Feedback for Teams Work

The debriefing tool I use is a Google Sheet. Every player has an allocated line to complete, noting how they thought the team performed (overall), how they performed (overall) – I use a 7-point emoji scale – and then a wide column that allows wrapped text where they can type their Notes. This process is superior to merely talking through a debrief because I have players type their responses and not their ‘enter’ until everyone is finished typing. That way, everyone’s honest thoughts are revealed when we say ‘3-2-1-Go’, and everyone hits enter, and then each player talks through their Notes in turn (so we even get to hear from the people who usually are very quiet).

Because everyone is contributing and investing in the team, the team is less likely to be destabilised by an unexpected loss. There is space in the next column for writing down solutions the team comes up with when discussing the Notes. This is what my Debrief tool looks like:

Conclusion: Feedback for Teams as a Competitive Advantage

In esports, where margins between victory and defeat are razor-thin, teams that master feedback for teams gain a decisive edge. Teams transform feedback from a dreaded obligation into a strategic asset by prioritising psychological safety, collaborative language, and shared accountability. The daily debrief becomes not just a post-mortem but a launchpad for innovation. When players trust that their voices matter—and that growth is a shared mission—they unlock cohesion and adaptability levels that no solo carry can match. Ultimately, the best teams aren’t just skilled and proficient at learning together.

By embedding these principles into their culture, esports teams can ensure that feedback for teams isn’t a checkbox exercise but the heartbeat of their success.